How to delete categorically - Two pushout complement constructions
نویسندگان
چکیده
In category theory, most set-theoretic constructions—union, intersection, etc.—have direct categorical counterparts. But up to now, there is no direct construction of a deletion operation like the set-theoretic complement. In rule-based transformation systems, deletion of parts of a given object is one of the main tasks. In the double pushout approach to algebraic graph transformation, the construction of pushout complements is used in order to locally delete structures from graphs. But in general categories, even if they have pushouts, pushout complements do not necessarily exist or are unique. In this paper, two different constructions for pushout complements are given and compared. Both constructions are based on certain universal constructions in the sense of category theory. More specifically, one uses initial pushouts while the other one uses quasi-coproduct complements. These constructions are applied to examples in the categories of graphs and simple graphs.
منابع مشابه
Changing Labels in the Double-Pushout Approach Can Be Treated Categorically
In the double-pushout approach to graph transformations, most authors assume the left-hand side to be injective, since the noninjective case leads to ambiguous results. Taking into consideration productions that change labels, however, may add ambiguity even in the case of injective graph productions. A well-known solution to this problem is restricting the categorical treatment to the underlyi...
متن کاملAlgebraic Approach to Single-Pushout Graph Transformation
The single-pushout approach to graph transformation interprets a double-pushout transformation rule of the classical algebraic approach which consists of two rotul graph morphisms as a single particll morphism from the left-to the right-hand side. The notion of a double-pushout diagram for the transformation process can then be substituted by a single-pushout diagram in an appropriate category ...
متن کاملA Fibred Approach to Rewriting | How the Duality between Adding and
We present a new approach to rewriting obtained by enhancing and unifying existing variants inside the algebraic (or better categorical) approach to (graph) rewriting. Our approach is motivated by second-order term graph rewriting and stresses on one hand the two-step nature of rule application consisting of deleting and adding items and on the other hand the heterogeneous nature of the rewriti...
متن کاملDeriving Process Congruences from Reaction Rules
This thesis is concerned with the development of a theory which, given a formalism with a reduction semantics, allows the derivation of a canonical labelled transition system on which bisimilarity as well as other other equivalences are congruences; provided that the contexts of the formalism form a category which has certain colimits. We shall begin by extending Leifer and Milner’s theory of r...
متن کاملA Fibred Approach to Rewriting | How the Duality between Adding and DeletingCooperates with the Di erence between Matching
We present a new approach to rewriting obtained by enhancing and unifying existing variants inside the algebraic (or better categorical) approach to (graph) rewriting. Our approach is motivated by second-order term graph rewriting and stresses on one hand the two-step nature of rule application consisting of deleting and adding items and on the other hand the heterogeneous nature of the rewriti...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Symb. Comput.
دوره 46 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011